tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5265813806993497215.post6007089659120703914..comments2024-01-29T00:22:36.258-08:00Comments on e y e C O N T A C T: More HeaphyJohn Hurrellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07411877334096071312noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5265813806993497215.post-11719970361719715002008-08-07T03:34:00.000-07:002008-08-07T03:34:00.000-07:00Oi, don't muddy the waters. You can read above wha...Oi, don't muddy the waters. You can read above what this site's policy is. I entend courtesies to whomever i please. The joke is that censorship is futile because the links are provided anyway. And images on this site are always good publicity, no matter what I might happen to say. <BR/><BR/>In other words, any publicity is ALWAYS good publicity. Most collectors are not going to be swayed by a review that goes against their visceral instinct. If they get that itch, and crave a particular work, nothing they can ever read will make them do a U-turn. But having an image broadcast is likely to attract other potential buyers. It's a win/win situation for the artist.John Hurrellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07411877334096071312noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5265813806993497215.post-28007168278063354582008-08-07T02:58:00.000-07:002008-08-07T02:58:00.000-07:00i would have thought they have a factual weight of...i would have thought they have a factual weight of their own, like the images of heaphy's you politely removed - so it wouldn't be surprising if they share the same fate. what's more heaphy has already proven that his preferred mode of confrontation is censorship so what further courtesies should be extended to him?a. nomiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10460820651481068895noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5265813806993497215.post-76029364490355237992008-08-07T02:35:00.000-07:002008-08-07T02:35:00.000-07:00Please identifiy yourself,a.nomie. That would give...Please identifiy yourself,a.nomie. That would give weight to your views, if Heaphy can confront you with your opinions like he can me with mine - if he so wishes.John Hurrellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07411877334096071312noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5265813806993497215.post-57499650480901173982008-08-07T02:15:00.000-07:002008-08-07T02:15:00.000-07:00heaphy's request for his image to be withdrawn is ...heaphy's request for his image to be withdrawn is as cowardly as his wholesale appropriations over the years. these date from the early 1990's and famously gave birth to peter robinson's 'stop thief' of 1994. while killeen has been an unacknowledged source for years in heaphy's work, his recent work gives a whole new meaning to the return of the repressed. heaphy even produced a series of black and red cut-outs in 2006: see http://www.nadene<BR/>milnegallery.com/art/stockroom/ChrisHeaphy. this is not homage, development upon, nor sherrie levine, but unimaginative theft.a. nomiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10460820651481068895noreply@blogger.com