Nau mai, haere mai, welcome to eyeCONTACT, a forum built to encourage art reviews and critical discussion about the visual culture of Aotearoa New Zealand. I'm John Hurrell its editor, a New Zealand writer, artist and curator. While Creative New Zealand and other supporters are generously paying me and other contributors to review exhibitions over the following year, all expressed opinions are entirely our own.
Showing posts with label Charles Ninow. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Charles Ninow. Show all posts

Friday, December 11, 2009

Discreetly activist








Comb a schooner like a comet: Annie Bradley, Matthew Crookes, Peter Madden, Charles Ninow, Beth Orton, Ralph Paine, Martyn Reynolds, Daniel Webby, Tao Wells
Newcall
1 December - 19 December 2009

Seeking work that was opinionated, inclined to agitation and direct, the Newcall curators for this exhibition have approached nine artists who according to the blurb, have practices oriented towards 'activism or confrontation.' At the same time, the curators are sensitive. They are cognisant of Free Will, that of the artists and their own in selecting them. So nothing can be assumed in terms of product.

That last bit is crucial because this is not really a placard waving show – though Tao Wells’ invitation of audience participation in placing photographs (with the word WAR) of the gallery neighbourhood in the gallery neighbourhood, and Ralph Paine’s large wall of paintings and drawings on paper, come closest to that lack of nuance in that their subject matter is obvious.

Wells’ project involves a box of 24 photocopied images of the gallery and the streets around it over which is placed WAR in bold yellow caps. He asks the viewer to either stick them up inside the gallery and/or outside, or to sell them as books. A couple ended up on Newcall walls, including one of some colourful birds placed over a power socket, folded so the word WAR was hidden. I didn’t spot any outdoor versions, except an Obama /Bush hybrid on the front door.

Ralph Paine’s wall-sized offering shows off his superb skills as an illustrator: images of jets, medieval battles, lots of explosions, curling waves, agonised skeletons and burning cities - the latter alluding to say, Beirut or Baghdad. All beautifully rendered in an understated fashion with no fine detail. And surprisingly for Paine – no text.

I didn’t see Peter Madden’s ‘para-performance’ on opening night – a found suitcase opened to reveal found photographs, but on a nearby wall is a small solitary photograph of what seems to be a group of sportsmen - maybe cricketers. A standing figure on the right has superimposed over half his body a military uniform, suggesting somebody killed in the Second World War.

Matthew Crookes has three works. One is a suite of sticky, peel-off letters that repeat the phrase In Loving Memory on a top corner of the glass front door. A second is a row on the floor of empty plastic book covers, all blood red. The third is a dessert spoon resting on a short piece of four by two. On its scoop are the stickered words: lick me disease.

Martyn Reynolds has a DVD presentation of a short looped film showing an old wooden chair standing in an empty field. It is projected onto a thin wall from an outside studio which when you look, contains the same chair holding the projector. The evocative flickering image is blue, that most poignant of colours; the chair a symbol for absence; the field perhaps a trope for European soil. We have pathos, yet a construction that is calculatedly knowing in its reflexivity.

Beth O’Brien’s single framed photograph of a young woman soldier struggling in a park to control an unwieldy, wind-dragged parafoil. Quiet Decisions, Specific Intentions seems to be an anti-military statement of considerable understatement, snorting at the notion of ‘managed’ intervention.

Uncontrollable process is showcased also in Daniel Webby’s installation, where a sloping ‘hammock’ of clear, wrinkled, cling film is suspended across the width of the gallery space between two towel holders. On it Webby has attempted to balance a gooey line of soaked dehydrated potato flakes, which has then fallen to the concrete floor. Attracting mould and smelling, the spud glop was later removed –though traces remain.

Annie Bradley contributes a two channelled video showing the artist and (I think) her father placing some household items in a trailer to be transported overnight. They need to be very securely tied down so they don’t slide around and get damaged. If you only know one knot… has one camera positioned on the van roof filming the trailer from above, while the other is partially aimed at a reflective window in the van’s door. The title advocates multiple approaches to problem-solving.

The last item is Charles Ninow’s sculpture that consists of two white trapezoid plywood forms on the floor. They seem to refer to the sloping eaves of a house and the demarcated proportions - measured out with steel brackets – of a sheet of a single bed. To speculate: the sheet in this context could be a shroud, and the ceiling, the ascension of a soul escaping from a corpse. An oblique and clinical, but also oddly evocative, work.

Shortly after writing and posting the above I was chatting to Dan Arps at Te Tuhi. He pointed out that the 'steel brackets' on the sloping upper surfaces of Charles Ninow's work are in fact anti-skateboarding blockers - an allusion to social control and American foreign policy perhaps.

Thursday, June 11, 2009

DIY heaven








Charles Ninow: Content and Delivery
448 Gallery (448 Karangahape Rd)
28 May - 18 June 2009
11-4 Wed, 2-6 Thurs, 11-4 Sat.

With a sizable chunk of Auckland’s gallery scene lined up on Karangahape Road, it is always interesting when some venues appear there for only a few exhibitions then move on. 448 Gallery, run by Elam students, has presented about five shows - and this Charles Ninow display is its last. A shame because it is located right next door to Gambia Castle and just down the road from Michael Lett and Starkwhite. A brilliant location for a gallery

Last year Ninow was awarded the Henrietta and Lola Anne Tunbridge Watercolour Prize (worth $10000) by AAG’s Senior Curator Ron Brownson, but this show is all sculpture and oils - though the latter involve some incredibly thin glazing. Like fragile washes that are barely detectable.

This exhibition reveals Ninow to be a great loiterer of hardware stores (many artists are), someone who gets blissed out poking around in Bunnings, Mitre 10 or Placemakers. He likes looking at building supplies and industrial products, checking out new materials or methods of joining, examining the units or modules they are sold in to see what can be useful.

Sometimes he just takes them straight off the rack directly to the gallery. How he gets them to or in the gallery is the content. The content becomes the form as altered by the delivery. Hence the show’s title.

A length of soft steel reinforcing rod, to be taken up the stairs to the viewing space, has to rolled up to be manoeuvred there, and then imperfectly straightened out once in the gallery.

Another sculpture is a wooden replica of an iron railing (with brackets) that is measured to fit the traces of a staircase detected in the gallery’s brick walls. Made of pine moulding and many joined extruded sections, it could only be placed in the room by being lifted through the outside first floor window, not via the door and staircase.

One surprising work is a thin bar of dense foam placed on the floor. The yellow material is same sort of spongy substance as the blue foam Peter Robinson used in ACK and his later Walters Prize exhibition, only this material is accompanied by lots of sandy specks sprinkled around it on the dark floor like a halo of filings.

The paintings seem more like exercises. They are less resolved compared to the sculpture, but they have a strange humour. They consist of delicately painted linen off-cuts (small discarded rectangles acquired from Studio Art Supplies) pinned near the top of immaculately framed noticeboards made from standard units of pinboard.

These have a ‘found’ sensitivity, being slightly wonky, hand-cut pieces of linen with gently undulating edges. The nuanced glazes and thin lines suggest Malevichs or spiritually oriented, symbolic abstractions constructed by readymades. The idea for the work comes from examining the hardware materials first, not through starting with a mental concept of idealised geometry.

In this unusual quirky show, the sprawling wooden banister and piece of splinter-clad golden foam have real presence. They are particularly intriguing. However the old brick walls of the space are worth looking at for themselves, outside of the quality of Ninow’s art. Call in while you have the chance. Enjoy both.



Thank you to the artist for the photos.

Monday, August 25, 2008

Hard-headed watercolour


2008 Henrietta and Lola Anne Tunbridge Scholarship exhibition
George Fraser
21 August -30 August 2008

This is an unusual idea, to have a $10,000 prize for watercolourists. And as it turns out, it’s a pretty nuggetty show. Not really about manual dexterity in rendering as some might expect - more about attitude and concept. In fact it’s an avant–garde show. It takes an extreme position, and is the better for that.

Ron Brownson, the judge, Senior Curator at AAG, made a good choice in choosing the winner. A toss up between Charles Ninow or Mark Foster, I’d say. Ninow’s six sheets of hideously glossy light card featured small groups of tiny red and yellow squares (a reference to mosaic tessellations) - some of them pin dots – swamped in a field of white. Utterly bizarre but also very funny. Nice title too: Stability on Thursdays (Working Towards Stability on Mondays) #1-6.

Two of the entries (Seul Ki Kim and Wendy Hannah) are too sentimental for this context and looked out of place, but the rest – Andrew De Freitas, Nicola Farquhar, Ninow, Mark Foster, and Ash Kilmartin – helped construct a tight little exhibition that celebrates rigor and steely resolve.

Some artists' statements might have been a handy option, but not a necessity. The written word is overvalued now in art academia and tends to smother the experiential, but most viewers are likely to be curious about the motivation behind these works.

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

More barricades



Charles Ninow: Effective Campaign Heroics
Curated by Ash Kilmartin
Window gallery, Auckland University Library entrance
July 9 – July 26 2008

Charles Ninow’s Window exhibition seems to reference Dane Mitchell’s Barricades exhibition at Starkwhite last year (and a little Daniel Malone thrown in as well) - such are its allusions to street barriers and Molotov Cocktails (see online video). The display consists of the glass space loaded up with dozens of paper posters folded into paper bags and filled with air. A cynical comment on revolutionary rhetoric perhaps, especially as barricades are usually made of sandbags (and a photo of some is on the webpage). Air filled bags may be good for bluffing at a distance, but they aren’t going to block bullets or tanks.

The same sarcasm seems prevalent in the video. Shaking a SUMMIT ginger beer bottle with a breadknife in it references petrol bombs, spray paint, and hoons spraying each other with beer. The results though, are only a lot of rattly noise. When the knife slips out to fall on the floor it is termed a ‘breakthrough’. Such spillages happen six times.

The online video and gallery display seem calculatedly vacuous. The latter has a European look about it, especially that of the great French artist Arman, who in the early sixties filled vitrines with consumer items, and sometimes dry rubbish. Just as Piero Manzoni canned and sold his own shit, Ninow with his fake Arman, seems to be provocatively marketing ‘hot air’ as ‘political’ content. Deliberately insubstantial - and adroitly droll at that.